UNITED STATES 7 July 2022 Gramercy

United States District Court, District of Wyoming, 7 July 2022, Case No. 21-CV-223-F

(Gramercy Distressed Opportunity Fund II, L.P. et al. v. Oleg ... Read more

United States District Court, District of Wyoming, 7 July 2022, Case No. 21-CV-223-F

(Gramercy Distressed Opportunity Fund II, L.P. et al. v. Oleg Bakhmatyuk et al.)

 

 

07 - 07 - 2022

UNITED STATES 7 July 2022 Gramercy

Jurisdiction United States
Summary

In an action alleging claims for civil liability under the Federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO), the District Court held that the proceeding should not be stayed and referred to arbitration because of the arbitration clause in certain trust deeds. While the trust deeds did delegate the issue of “arbitrability” – whether the parties were bound to an arbitration clause – to arbitrators through the incorporation of the rules of the London Court of International Arbitration, neither the plaintiffs nor the defendants were parties to the trust deeds. The Court therefore examine the issue independently and concluded that under the applicable English law, the defendants could not enforce the arbitration clause against the plaintiffs.

Related topics
201

The court discusses whether the dispute falls within the wording of the arbitration agreement; and whether claims in tort fall within the scope of the agreement.

Scope of arbitration agreement
226

Multi-party disputes: The court discusses under which conditions non-signatories are covered by an arbitration agreement entered into by another party.

Third parties (see also Art. I sub F "problems concerning the identity of the respondent", ¶106)
UNITED STATES 7 July 2022 Gramercy