UNITED STATES 851 A

United States District Court, District of Colorado, 27 August 2015

(DynaResource de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. et al. v. Goldgroup Resources, Inc.)

27 - 08 - 2015

UNITED STATES 851 A

Yearbook Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, A.J. van den Berg (ed.), Vol. XLI (2016)
Jurisdiction United States
Summary

See also United States District Court, District of Colorado, 29 September 2015

(DynaResource de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. et al. v. Goldgroup Resources, Inc.)

UNITED STATES 851 B

Related topics
201

The court discusses whether the dispute falls within the wording of the arbitration agreement; and whether claims in tort fall within the scope of the agreement.

Scope of arbitration agreement
214 Agreement providing for arbitration in another State
215 Agreement providing for arbitration within forum's State
216 No place of arbitration designated
217

The court discusses the meaning and effect of the referral of the resolution of disputes to arbitration, including: who can ask for referral and when, whether a party has waived its right to request arbitration, the defense that there was no contract at all; whether there was a condition precedent to the commencement of arbitration (e.g. mediation), stay of proceedings v. compelling arbitration, and national procedural specificities such as remand and removal (US), effect of class action. etc.

Referral to arbitration in general
222

The court discusses the principle of competence-competence, including whether the parties “intended to have arbitrability decided by an arbitrator”, and the separability of the arbitration agreement from the main contract.

Arbitrator's competence and separability of the arbitration clause
704(A) Panama Convention of 1975
UNITED STATES 851 A