US 792. United States District Court, Southern District of New York, 6 August 2013
Related topics
502
The court discusses the principle that the merits of the award may not be reviewed and that the court may only carry out a limited review of the award to ascertain grounds for refusal.
No re-examination of the merits of the arbitral award
503
The court discusses the burden of proof of the grounds for refusing enforcement under the Convention.
Burden of proof on respondent
509
Due process: The court discusses what constitutes “proper notice” of the appointment of the arbitrators or of the arbitration proceedings.
"Proper notice"
524
Public policy: The court discusses the effect of other alleged violations of public policy on the recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award, such as contradictory reasons, manifest disregard of the law (US), etc.