UNITED STATES 607

18 - 12 - 2006

UNITED STATES 607

Yearbook Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, A.J. van den Berg (ed.), Vol. XXXII (2007)
Jurisdiction United States
Summary

US 607. United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, 18 December 2006

Related topics
214-216 Field of application
220

The court discusses how to interpret the Convention’s requirement that the agreement is not null and void etc., as well as specific cases of invalidity: e.g., lack of consent (misrepresentation, duress, or fraud), vague wording of the arbitral clause; other terms of the contract contradict the intention to arbitrate, etc.

"Null and void", etc.
221

The court discusses which law – lex fori, lex contractus, law of the State where the award will be made – applies specifically to determining whether an agreement to arbitrate is “null and void etc.“, and, by extension, which law applies to determining the validity of arbitration agreements.

Law applicable to "Null and void", etc. (for formal validity and applicable law, see Art. II, ¶204)
223

The court discusses whether a certain dispute could be settled by arbitration, and the law applicable to that determination.

Arbitrability (see also Art. V(2) sub ground a. "arbitrability", ¶519)
UNITED STATES 607