UNITED STATES 569 A

United States District Court, Southern District of New York, 24 January 2006

(Oriental Republic of Uruguay, et al. v. Chemical Overseas Holdings, Inc., et al.)

24 - 01 - 2006

UNITED STATES 569 A

Yearbook Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, A.J. van den Berg (ed.), Vol. XXXI (2006)
Jurisdiction United States
Summary

See also United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 14 April 2006

(Oriental Republic of Uruguay, et al. v. Chemical Overseas Holdings, Inc., et al.)

UNITED STATES 569 B

Related topics
201

The court discusses whether the dispute falls within the wording of the arbitration agreement; and whether claims in tort fall within the scope of the agreement.

Scope of arbitration agreement
222

The court discusses the principle of competence-competence, including whether the parties “intended to have arbitrability decided by an arbitrator”, and the separability of the arbitration agreement from the main contract.

Arbitrator's competence and separability of the arbitration clause
524

Public policy: The court discusses the effect of other alleged violations of public policy on the recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award, such as contradictory reasons, manifest disregard of the law (US), etc.

Other cases
UNITED STATES 569 A