UNITED STATES 454 A

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama, Southern Division, 16 June 2003 

(Marubeni Corporation, et al. v. Mobile Bay Wood Chip Center, et al.)

16 - 06 - 2003

UNITED STATES 454 A

Yearbook Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, A.J. van den Berg (ed.), Vol. XXIX (2004)
Jurisdiction United States
Summary

See also United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama, Southern Division, 19 September 2003

(Marubeni Corporation, et al. v. Mobile Bay Wood Chip Center, et al.)

UNITED STATES 454 B

Related topics
201

The court discusses whether the dispute falls within the wording of the arbitration agreement; and whether claims in tort fall within the scope of the agreement.

Scope of arbitration agreement
214-216 Field of application
217

The court discusses the meaning and effect of the referral of the resolution of disputes to arbitration, including: who can ask for referral and when, whether a party has waived its right to request arbitration, the defense that there was no contract at all; whether there was a condition precedent to the commencement of arbitration (e.g. mediation), stay of proceedings v. compelling arbitration, and national procedural specificities such as remand and removal (US), effect of class action. etc.

Referral to arbitration in general
218

The court discusses whether referral of the resolution of disputes to arbitration is mandatory under the Convention and whether mandatory referral is an internationally uniform rule which supersedes municipal law.

Referral is mandatory
UNITED STATES 454 A