The district court had denied the non-signatory defendant's motion to compel arbitration, relying entirely on the 2018 holding of the Eleventh Circuit in Outokumpu that the New York Convention requires that the parties actually sign the agreement containing the arbitration clause, and that the non-signatory subcontractor could not rely on domestic equitable estoppel doctrines to enforce the arbitration agreement because equitable estoppel doctrines conflicts with the New York Convention's signatory requirement. Subsequent to the district court's decision, however, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed the decision of the Eleventh Circuit, holding that nothing in the New York Convention conflicts with the application of relevant equitable doctrines. Consistent with that Supreme Court ruling, the Eleventh Circuit granted the appeal from the decision of the district court in this case in a short per curiam decision, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.