In its first decision, the Court granted confirmation of an ICC award rendered in Paris, denying the argument of the defendant that there had been a violation of due process because the sole arbitrator based the award, in part, on an interpretation of the contract that neither party had argued or relied on. The Court found instead that a review of the award showed otherwise. It also denied the defendant's motion to stay the enforcement proceedings. By its second decision, the Court granted Tetronics' motion for the entry of a default judgment confirming the award.