The Court confirmed an AAA award in its first decision, holding that, “based on the record provided, together with the appropriate narrow level of review”, there was no disputed material issue of fact and that the award should be confirmed. The Court denied without prejudice the plaintiff’s request for attorney’s fees and costs, because the plaintiff failed to provide records supporting these fees, and its request for pre-judgment interest, because it failed to provide any support or authority for seeking pre-judgment interest; nor did it indicate the rate of pre-judgment interest it sought. In the second decision, the Court granted the plaintiff’s renewed motions for prejudgment interest and for attorney's fees and costs.