UNITED STATES 93 B

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, 21 October 1988

(Thomassen & Driver – Verblifa NV v. Sardee Industries Inc.)

21 - 10 - 1988

UNITED STATES 93 B

Yearbook Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, A.J. van den Berg (ed.), Vol. XV (1990)
Jurisdiction United States
Summary

See also United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, 27 September 1998

(Thomassen & Driver – Verblifa NV v. Sardee Industries Inc.)

UNITED STATES 93 A

Related topics
201

The court discusses whether the dispute falls within the wording of the arbitration agreement; and whether claims in tort fall within the scope of the agreement.

Scope of arbitration agreement
220

The court discusses how to interpret the Convention’s requirement that the agreement is not null and void etc., as well as specific cases of invalidity: e.g., lack of consent (misrepresentation, duress, or fraud), vague wording of the arbitral clause; other terms of the contract contradict the intention to arbitrate, etc.

"Null and void", etc.
UNITED STATES 93 B