UNITED STATES 830 B

United States District Court, District of Guam, 24 August 2015

(Esther Margarita Lima Suarez Viuda de Yang et al. v. Majestic Blue Fisheries, LLC et al.)

24 - 08 - 2015

UNITED STATES 830 B

Yearbook Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, A.J. van den Berg (ed.), Vol. XL (2015)
Jurisdiction United States
Summary

See also United States District Court, District of Guam, 14 January 2015 

(Esther Margarita Lima Suarez Viuda de Yang et al. v. Majestic Blue Fisheries, LLC et al.)

UNITED STATES 830 A

Related topics
214-216 Field of application
217

The court discusses the meaning and effect of the referral of the resolution of disputes to arbitration, including: who can ask for referral and when, whether a party has waived its right to request arbitration, the defense that there was no contract at all; whether there was a condition precedent to the commencement of arbitration (e.g. mediation), stay of proceedings v. compelling arbitration, and national procedural specificities such as remand and removal (US), effect of class action. etc.

Referral to arbitration in general
220

The court discusses how to interpret the Convention’s requirement that the agreement is not null and void etc., as well as specific cases of invalidity: e.g., lack of consent (misrepresentation, duress, or fraud), vague wording of the arbitral clause; other terms of the contract contradict the intention to arbitrate, etc.

"Null and void", etc.
226

Multi-party disputes: The court discusses under which conditions non-signatories are covered by an arbitration agreement entered into by another party.

Third parties (see also Art. I sub F "problems concerning the identity of the respondent", ¶106)
UNITED STATES 830 B