The Court dismissed a motion for injunctive relief, applying the doctrine of forum non conveniens to determine whether the motion was proper. The Supreme Court holds, first, that an agreement to arbitrate before a specified tribunal is a specialized kind of forum-selection clause; and, second, that the appropriate way to enforce a forum-selection clause pointing to a foreign forum is through the doctrine of forum non conveniens. Reading these two holdings together, the District Court considered that arbitration agreements, including arbitration agreements subject to the New York Convention and the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), should be enforced through the doctrine of forum non conveniens.