UNITED STATES 314 B

United States District Court, Southern District of New York, 30 June 1999

(SATCOM International Group PLC v. ORBCOMM International Partners, LP)

30 - 06 - 1999

UNITED STATES 314 B

Yearbook Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, A.J. van den Berg (ed.), Vol. XXV (2000)
Jurisdiction United States
Summary

See also United States District Court, Southern District of New York, 27 May 1999 

(SATCOM International Group PLC v. ORBCOMM International Partners, LP)

UNITED STATES 314 A

Related topics
102

The court discusses which awards are considered non-domestic even if rendered in the State of enforcement (international element, lex mercatoria).

Arbitral award not considered as domestic (paragraph 1)
201

The court discusses whether the dispute falls within the wording of the arbitration agreement; and whether claims in tort fall within the scope of the agreement.

Scope of arbitration agreement
202

The court discusses the form in which the arbitration agreement is expressed: short form arbitration clause, reference to rules of institution, etc.

Contents of arbitration agreement
214-216 Field of application
217

The court discusses the meaning and effect of the referral of the resolution of disputes to arbitration, including: who can ask for referral and when, whether a party has waived its right to request arbitration, the defense that there was no contract at all; whether there was a condition precedent to the commencement of arbitration (e.g. mediation), stay of proceedings v. compelling arbitration, and national procedural specificities such as remand and removal (US), effect of class action. etc.

Referral to arbitration in general
228

Related court proceedings: The court discusses whether provisional measures, such as the pre-award attachment of assets, are compatible with the Convention.

Pre-award attachment and other provisional measures
UNITED STATES 314 B