UNITED KINGDOM 133

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, 19 February 2025, Case No. CA-2024-000810

(General Dynamics United Kingdom Limited v. State of Libya)

19 - 02 - 2025

UNITED KINGDOM 133

Yearbook Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, S. W. Schill (ed.), Vol. XL (2025)
Jurisdiction United Kingdom
Summary

The Court of Appeal held that by agreeing to the arbitration clause in the contract with General Dynamics – which provided that the award shall be final, binding and wholly enforceable – Libya had waived immunity from execution. The Court reasoned that while it was well established that states can submit to another state’s (recognition) jurisdiction without consenting to execution against their property – such is the case under the New York Convention and the ICSID Convention – a straightforward reading of the clause at hand, particularly of its reference to the ICC Rules, by which the parties undertake to carry out any award without delay, justified the conclusion that the parties had consented to both the adjudicative and enforcement jurisdiction.

Related topics
105

The court discusses issues relating to the quality of the parties, as physical or legal persons against whom enforcement of an arbitral award is sought, including the incapacity of a State to enter into an arbitration agreement, and questions relating to sovereign immunity. For the related defenses to enforcement, see Art. V(1)(a).

"Persons, whether physical or legal" (paragraph 1) (including sovereign immunity)
301

The court discusses the principle that the procedure for the enforcement of awards under the Convention is governed by the lex fori, as well as procedural issues (such as the competent enforcement court) not falling under the specific cases of ¶¶ 302-307.

Procedure for enforcement in general
UNITED KINGDOM 133