- You are here:
- Home
- Court Decisions
- UKRAINE 5 A
UKRAINE 5 A
Sribnyanskyi District Court, Chernihivska Region, 24 January 2013 [erroneously indicated as 4 January 2013 in the Yearbook]
(Nibulon SA v. Nasinnia-Agrokhim Limited Liability Company)
UKRAINE 5 A
See also Court of Appeal, Chernihivska Region, 2 March 2013
(Nibulon SA v. Nasinnia-Agrokhim Limited Liability Company)
UKRAINE 5 B
The court discusses the principle that the procedure for the enforcement of awards under the Convention is governed by the lex fori, as well as procedural issues (such as the competent enforcement court) not falling under the specific cases of ¶¶ 302-307.
The court discusses the general conditions the Convention imposes on a petitioner for seeking recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award – namely, the submission of the original arbitration agreement or arbitral award or a certified copy thereof – and examines in general whether these conditions were complied in the case at issue.
The court discusses questions relating to the general approach taken by the Convention to the grounds for refusal of recognition and enforcement, including its pro-enforcement bias, as well as the system of the Convention, under which recognition and enforcement may only be denied on seven listed grounds and the petitioner has only the obligations set out in Art. IV.
The court discusses the principle that the merits of the award may not be reviewed and that the court may only carry out a limited review of the award to ascertain grounds for refusal.
The court discusses the burden of proof of the grounds for refusing enforcement under the Convention.
Due process: The court discusses what constitutes “proper notice” of the appointment of the arbitrators or of the arbitration proceedings.