UNITED KINGDOM 56 B

House of Lords, 9 March 2000

(Inco Europe Ltd, et al. v. First Choice Distribution et al.)

09 - 03 - 2000

UNITED KINGDOM 56 B

Yearbook Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, A.J. van den Berg (ed.), Vol. XXV (2000)
Jurisdiction United Kingdom
Summary

See also Court of Appeal, 30 September 1998 

(Inco Europe Ltd, et al. v. First Choice Distribution et al.)

UNITED KINGDOM 56 A

Related topics
217

The court discusses the meaning and effect of the referral of the resolution of disputes to arbitration, including: who can ask for referral and when, whether a party has waived its right to request arbitration, the defense that there was no contract at all; whether there was a condition precedent to the commencement of arbitration (e.g. mediation), stay of proceedings v. compelling arbitration, and national procedural specificities such as remand and removal (US), effect of class action. etc.

Referral to arbitration in general
220

The court discusses how to interpret the Convention’s requirement that the agreement is not null and void etc., as well as specific cases of invalidity: e.g., lack of consent (misrepresentation, duress, or fraud), vague wording of the arbitral clause; other terms of the contract contradict the intention to arbitrate, etc.

"Null and void", etc.
223

The court discusses whether a certain dispute could be settled by arbitration, and the law applicable to that determination.

Arbitrability (see also Art. V(2) sub ground a. "arbitrability", ¶519)
UNITED KINGDOM 56 B