The Court granted exequatur of an award rendered by an arbitral tribunal of the Danish Institute of Arbitration, dismissing the contention that enforcement would violate public policy because the contract between the parties effectively prohibited the defendant from disposing of its shares in a company, which also constituted a violation of EU and Spanish competition law. The Court stressed that the public policy objection under the New York Convention only concerns the violation of fundamental rights, and does not allow the court to review the arbitrators' interpretation of the contract. In the present case, the arbitrators had deemed the agreement between the parties valid, and had concluded that the defendant was not to be deemed an enterprise in this context for the purpose of competition law. The Court had first denied the request to suspend the enforcement proceeding under Art. VI of the Convention pending an annulment action in Denmark.