The Court denied recognition and enforcement of a CAS award, finding that the alleged arbitration clause in the parties' service agreement was ambiguous and therefore a common intention to arbitrate could not be ascertained. The clause provided that disputes that could not be settled by negotiations would be referred to the Arbitrazh (Commercial) Court of the City of Moscow, but also that in case of CAS arbitration, the dispute was to be resolved by a sole arbitrator in an arbitration conducted in English. No further conditions for CAS arbitration were specified. The Court also held that recognition and enforcement would violate the public policy of the Russian Federation, because the award granted the claimant’s claim for payment under the service agreement without determining that the service had in fact been supplied.