In its decision of 20 June 2016, in case no. 173/2016, the Court of Cassation held that foreign arbitral
awards shall be dealt with as national awards as regards their enforcement. The national courts shall follow
the procedures for the enforcement of domestic awards provided by the national legislation if such
procedures are less ... Read more

In its decision of 20 June 2016, in case no. 173/2016, the Court of Cassation held that foreign arbitral
awards shall be dealt with as national awards as regards their enforcement. The national courts shall follow
the procedures for the enforcement of domestic awards provided by the national legislation if such
procedures are less complicated than the procedures for the enforcement foreign arbitral awards. This
principle, however, shall apply only in respect of the procedures for executing the award; it shall not apply
to any other conditions or rules that may be imposed by the legislation with regard to the form of the
arbitral award or similar matters. The Court held specifically that submission of the documents indicated in
Art. IV of the New York Convention shall be considered sufficient evidence – unless the contrary is proved –
for the validity and enforceability of the award. In the case at issue, the applicant had supplied all
documents necessary to enforce the award, which had been rendered by an ICC tribunal in Paris. The Court
of Cassation then found that the appeal filed by the present appellant before the French Cour de Cassation
against the denial of its request to set the award aside did not affect the award or suspend its enforcement.
The appealed Qatari decision in this case had not applied this principle and was therefore mistaken.