NETHERLANDS 2025-1

Gerechtshof, Amsterdam, 16 April 2024, Case No. 200.328.375/01

(GPGC Limited v. The Government of the Republic of Ghana)

16 - 04 - 2024

NETHERLANDS 2025-1

Yearbook Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, S. W. Schill (ed.), Vol. XL (2025)
Jurisdiction Netherlands
Summary

The Court of Appeal held that a London award could be granted exequatur, even though the claimant had not supplied the original arbitration clause between the parties, or a certified copy thereof, because the original agreement was no longer available. The Court explained that the purpose of Article IV(1)(b) of the New York Convention was to prove the existence and content of the arbitration agreement, which could be proved otherwise here as the respondent had not disputed the existence and content of the contract containing the arbitration clause and had even made some partial payments under the award.

Related topics
101

The court discusses the determination and relevance of the place where the award was made (in a foreign State or another contracting State.

Award made in the territory of another (Contracting) State (paragraphs 1 and 3 - first or "reciprocity" reservation)
301

The court discusses the principle that the procedure for the enforcement of awards under the Convention is governed by the lex fori, as well as procedural issues (such as the competent enforcement court) not falling under the specific cases of ¶¶ 302-307.

Procedure for enforcement in general
403

The court discusses issues relating to the requirement to supply the original arbitration agreement or a copy thereof to prove the prima facie validity of the arbitration agreement, as well as the application of more favorable municipal laws that do not provide for this requirement.

Original or copy arbitration agreement
500

The court discusses the overall scheme and/or pro-enforcement bias of the Convention.

Grounds for refusal of enforcement in general
NETHERLANDS 2025-1