India 66

Supreme Court of India, 2 June 2020

(M/S Centrotrade Minerals and Metals INC v. Hindustan Copper Ltd.)

02 - 06 - 2020

India 66

Yearbook Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, S. W. Schill (ed.), Vol. XLVI (2021)
Jurisdiction India
Original full text Full text decision India 66
Excerpt Excerpt decision India 66
Summary

The Court rejected the argument that the respondent had not been given proper notice of the appointment of the arbitrator or of the arbitral proceedings or had been otherwise unable to present his case in an ICC arbitration in London, refusing to give a broad interpretation of “otherwise”. 
Related topics
510

Due process: The court discusses what are to be considered proper time limits and notice periods that fulfill the requirement that the party opposing recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award was extended due process.

Time limits and notice periods
India 66