Hungary No. 13. Not indicated v. Not indicated, Ítélőtábla [Regional Court of Appeal], Debrecen, Decision No. l Pkf. III. 20.503/2005/2, Publication No. 2006. 1315, date not indicated
Related topics
503
The court discusses the burden of proof of the grounds for refusing enforcement under the Convention.
Burden of proof on respondent
511
Due process: The court discusses various irregularities affecting due process, including letters not sent, names of arbitrators or experts not communicated, language of proceedings and communications, etc.