HUNGARY 12

Legfelsőbb Bíróság, date not indicated, Decision
No. Pf. I. 26.724/2001, Publication No. 2003.12.505 

Not indicated v. Not indicated

01 - 01 - 2001

HUNGARY 12

Yearbook Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, S. W. Schill (ed.), Vol. XLV (2020)
Jurisdiction Hungary
Summary

Hungary No. 12. Not indicated v. Not indicated, Legfelsőbb Bíróság [Supreme Court], Decision No. Pf. I. 26.724/2001, Publication No. 2003.12.505, date not indicated

Related topics
502

The court discusses the principle that the merits of the award may not be reviewed and that the court may only carry out a limited review of the award to ascertain grounds for refusal.

No re-examination of the merits of the arbitral award
511

Due process: The court discusses various irregularities affecting due process, including letters not sent, names of arbitrators or experts not communicated, language of proceedings and communications, etc.

"Otherwise unable to present his case"
524

Public policy: The court discusses the effect of other alleged violations of public policy on the recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award, such as contradictory reasons, manifest disregard of the law (US), etc.

Other cases
HUNGARY 12