The Court examined whether there had been an unacceptable delay on the part of the respondent in filing its application to set aside the order enforcing an LCIA award. The Court explained that the merits of the set-aside application were one of the factors to be considered when deciding whether an extension of time should be granted. In the present case, the only ground invoked by the respondent was that the arbitration hearing had been virtual, which was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties and had resulted in the respondent being unable to present its case adequately. The Court found that there was no merit in the set-aside application, and denied the request to file it out of time.