The Court refused to enforce an arbitral award rendered in Taiwan, setting aside the enforcement order initially granted, on the grounds that the award dealt with matters not falling within the terms of the arbitration clause, and that the defendant had been unable to present its case in the arbitration, because it had not been given the reasonable opportunity to adduce evidence and make submissions on the effects of the violation of certain provisions of Taiwanese law. See also HONG KONG 36 B, in which the Court confirmed its earlier finding.