In China PR 47, the Court had denied exequatur of an ICC award, on the ground that it was not proven that the award was final and had been served on the defendant. The applicant filed a new request. The Court again refused to grant recognition and enforcement, finding that the evidence submitted by the applicant – a certificate of service issued by the ICC – was insufficient to prove service of the award, because it was not notarized or authenticated as required by the Chinese Supreme People’s Court Provisions on Evidence in Civil Litigation. The Court also noted that the ICC certificate stated that the award was delivered to an address different from the mailing address of the defendant indicated in the award.