The Court granted recognition of a CAS award rendered in respect of the employment contract of a football coach. The respondent claimed that an employment dispute was not arbitrable under the laws of PR China, and that, therefore, the award had not been rendered in respect of a commercial relationship and fell under China’s commercial reservation to the New York Convention. Noting that the employment contract had been concluded between equal parties and had a commercial content, the Court found that it qualified as a commercial relationship and that a dispute thereunder was a commercial dispute.