- You are here:
- Home
- Court Decisions
- CANADA 29 C
CANADA 29 C
Court of Appeal for Ontario, 22 February 2010
(Donaldson International Livestock Ltd. v. Znamensky Selekcionno-Gibridny Center LLC, et al.)
CANADA 29 C
See also Court of Appeal for Ontario, 23 December 2008 (Donaldson International Livestock Ltd. v. Znamensky Selekcionno-Gibridny Center LLC, et al.) CANADA 29 A
and
Superior Court of Justice, Ontario, 29 September 2009 (Donaldson International Livestock Ltd. v. Znamensky Selekcionno-Gibridny Center LLC, et al.) CANADA 29 B
The court discusses whether the dispute falls within the wording of the arbitration agreement; and whether claims in tort fall within the scope of the agreement.
The court discusses the meaning and effect of the referral of the resolution of disputes to arbitration, including: who can ask for referral and when, whether a party has waived its right to request arbitration, the defense that there was no contract at all; whether there was a condition precedent to the commencement of arbitration (e.g. mediation), stay of proceedings v. compelling arbitration, and national procedural specificities such as remand and removal (US), effect of class action. etc.
The court discusses how to interpret the Convention’s requirement that the agreement is not null and void etc., as well as specific cases of invalidity: e.g., lack of consent (misrepresentation, duress, or fraud), vague wording of the arbitral clause; other terms of the contract contradict the intention to arbitrate, etc.
The court discusses the principle that the procedure for the enforcement of awards under the Convention is governed by the lex fori, as well as procedural issues (such as the competent enforcement court) not falling under the specific cases of ¶¶ 302-307.
Public policy: The court discusses the effect of other alleged violations of public policy on the recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award, such as contradictory reasons, manifest disregard of the law (US), etc.