- You are here:
- Home
- Court Decisions
- AUSTRALIA 44 A
AUSTRALIA 44 A
Federal Court of Australia, General Division, New South Wales District Registry, 2 November 2015
(Johnson Ye v. Ronghuo Zeng (a/k/a Andrew Tsang) et al.)
AUSTRALIA 44 A
See also Federal Court of Australia, General Division, New South Wales District Registry, 13 November 2015 (Johnson Ye v. Ronghuo Zeng (a/k/a Andrew Tsang) et al.) AUSTRALIA 44 B
The court discusses the principle that the merits of the award may not be reviewed and that the court may only carry out a limited review of the award to ascertain grounds for refusal.
Award not binding, suspended or set aside: The court discusses the difference between the exclusive jurisdiction to set aside an award (primary jurisdiction), which belongs to the courts of the country of origin of the award, and the jurisdiction of all other courts to recognize and enforce the award (secondary jurisdiction); issues relating to the determination of the “competent authority”; and whether an award that has been set aside in the country of origin can be enforced in another State under the Convention.
The court discusses the conditions for granting adjournment of a proceeding relating to the recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award, and the court’s discretionary power to do so, as well the determination of “suitable security” and the power to request it.