Bibliography
  • Author Title Topic
  • Abby Chohen Smutny and Hansel T. Pham
    Enforcing Foreign Arbitral Awards in the United States: The Non-Arbitrable Subject Matter Defense
    519

    Public policy: The court discusses cases in which the subject matter of the award was not arbitrable in the enforcement State on public policy grounds.

  • Abhishek M. Singhvi
    Article II(3) of the New York Convention and the Courts
    217

    The court discusses the meaning and effect of the referral of the resolution of disputes to arbitration, including: who can ask for referral and when, whether a party has waived its right to request arbitration, the defense that there was no contract at all; whether there was a condition precedent to the commencement of arbitration (e.g. mediation), stay of proceedings v. compelling arbitration, and national procedural specificities such as remand and removal (US), effect of class action. etc.

  • Adelino Arantes Neto
    La Convención De Nueva York Y Los Tratados Del Mercosur
    703(A)
  • Ahmed S. EI-Kosheri
    The Enforcement of Awards Nullified in the Country of Origin
    516

    Award not binding, suspended or set aside: The court discusses the difference between the exclusive jurisdiction to set aside an award (primary jurisdiction), which belongs to the courts of the country of origin of the award, and the jurisdiction of all other courts to recognize and enforce the award (secondary jurisdiction); issues relating to the determination of the “competent authority”; and whether an award that has been set aside in the country of origin can be enforced in another State under the Convention.

  • Aida B. Avanessian
    The New York Convention and Denationalised Arbitral Awards (With Emphasis on the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal)
    114

    The court discusses whether awards rendered by the Iran-US Claims Tribunal fall under the Convention.

  • Prof. A.J. Van den Berg
    The Application of the New York Convention by the Courts
  • Prof. A.J. Van den Berg
    Non-domestic arbitral awards under the 1958 New York Convention
    102

    The court discusses which awards are considered non-domestic even if rendered in the State of enforcement (international element, lex mercatoria).

  • Prof. A.J. Van den Berg
    Consolidated Arbitrations, the New York Arbitration Convention and the Dutch Arbitration Act 1986 - A Replique to Mr Jarvin
    225

    Multi-party disputes: The court discusses the consolidation of arbitrations; also, whether the possibility of conflicting awards is a ground for refusing enforcement of an arbitration agreement.

  • Prof. A.J. Van den Berg
    Recent Enforcement Problems under the New York and ICSID Conventions
  • Prof. A.J. Van den Berg
    The New York Convention 1958 and Panama Convention 1975: Redundancy or Compatibility?
    512
  • Prof. A.J. Van den Berg
    La Aplicación De La Convención de Nueva York de 1958 A Laudos No Nacionales
    109

    The court discusses whether an “a-national” award falls under the Convention. 

  • Prof. A.J. Van den Berg
    Striving for uniform interpretation
    001

    The court discusses general questions relating to the interpretation of the Convention as an international treaty, also in respect of the methods of interpretation laid down in the 1969 Vienna Convention; the relationship between the New York Convention and the UNCITRAL Model Law and Recommendation 2006. 

  • Prof. A.J. Van den Berg
    Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention
  • Prof. A.J. Van den Berg
    50 Years of the New York Convention
  • Prof. A.J. Van den Berg
    Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Annulled in Russia
    516

    Award not binding, suspended or set aside: The court discusses the difference between the exclusive jurisdiction to set aside an award (primary jurisdiction), which belongs to the courts of the country of origin of the award, and the jurisdiction of all other courts to recognize and enforce the award (secondary jurisdiction); issues relating to the determination of the “competent authority”; and whether an award that has been set aside in the country of origin can be enforced in another State under the Convention.

  • Alexis Mourre
    "May Or Must?" Las Causales De No Reconocimiento De Laudos Previstas En El Articulo V De La Convención De Nueva York, son Ellas Facultativas?
    500

    The court discusses the overall scheme and/or pro-enforcement bias of the Convention.

  • Andrea Giardina
    The Practical Application of Multilateral Conventions
    703(A)
  • Andrea Saldarriaga
    El Requisito De Forma Escrita Del Articulo II .2 De La Convención De Nuevayork Y La Doctrina Del Grupo De Sociedades, Están De Más En El Arbitraje Internacional?
    106

    The court discusses issues relating to the identity of the party against whom enforcement of the arbitral award is sought, including: piercing of the corporate veil, succession, assignment, State or State entity, group of companies, agent or principal, etc. For the related defenses to enforcement, see Art. V(1)(a).

    226

    Multi-party disputes: The court discusses under which conditions non-signatories are covered by an arbitration agreement entered into by another party.

  • Andreas Reiner
    The Form of the Agent's Power to Sign an Arbitration Agreement and Article II(2) of the New York Convention
    212

    The court discusses issues specific to an arbitration agreement concluded through an agent or broker, e.g., whether the authorization to conclude it must also be in writing.

  • Andres Cerisola
    Convención De Nueva York Y Convención De Montevideo De 1979
    703(A)
  • Andrés Jana Linetzky And Johanna Klein Kranenberg
    La Convención De Nueva York Y El Ciadi Reconocimiento Y Ejecución De Laudos Arbitrales Bajo La Convención De Washington
    703(A)
  • Andrew Rogers
    The Enforcement of Awards Nullified in the Country of Origin
    516

    Award not binding, suspended or set aside: The court discusses the difference between the exclusive jurisdiction to set aside an award (primary jurisdiction), which belongs to the courts of the country of origin of the award, and the jurisdiction of all other courts to recognize and enforce the award (secondary jurisdiction); issues relating to the determination of the “competent authority”; and whether an award that has been set aside in the country of origin can be enforced in another State under the Convention.

  • Antonio Aljure Salame
    El Literal C) Del Articulo V De La Convención De Nueva York Del 1o De Junio De 1958
    512
  • Antonio Aljure Salame
    Convención De Nueva York Y Convención De Panamá
    704(A)
  • Anthony C. Sinclair
    The Assignment of Arbitration Agreements
    212

    The court discusses issues specific to an arbitration agreement concluded through an agent or broker, e.g., whether the authorization to conclude it must also be in writing.

    226

    Multi-party disputes: The court discusses under which conditions non-signatories are covered by an arbitration agreement entered into by another party.