Bibliography
  • Author Title Topic
  • Abby Chohen Smutny and Hansel T. Pham
    Enforcing Foreign Arbitral Awards in the United States: The Non-Arbitrable Subject Matter Defense
    519

    Public policy: The court discusses cases in which the subject matter of the award was not arbitrable in the enforcement State on public policy grounds.

  • Abhishek M. Singhvi
    Article II(3) of the New York Convention and the Courts
    217

    The court discusses the meaning and effect of the referral of the resolution of disputes to arbitration, including: who can ask for referral and when, whether a party has waived its right to request arbitration, the defense that there was no contract at all; whether there was a condition precedent to the commencement of arbitration (e.g. mediation), stay of proceedings v. compelling arbitration, and national procedural specificities such as remand and removal (US), effect of class action. etc.

  • Adelino Arantes Neto
    La Convención De Nueva York Y Los Tratados Del Mercosur
    703(A)
  • Ahmed S. EI-Kosheri
    The Enforcement of Awards Nullified in the Country of Origin
    516

    Award not binding, suspended or set aside: The court discusses the difference between the exclusive jurisdiction to set aside an award (primary jurisdiction), which belongs to the courts of the country of origin of the award, and the jurisdiction of all other courts to recognize and enforce the award (secondary jurisdiction); issues relating to the determination of the “competent authority”; and whether an award that has been set aside in the country of origin can be enforced in another State under the Convention.

  • Aida B. Avanessian
    The New York Convention and Denationalised Arbitral Awards (With Emphasis on the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal)
    114

    The court discusses whether awards rendered by the Iran-US Claims Tribunal fall under the Convention.

  • Prof. A.J. Van den Berg
    The Application of the New York Convention by the Courts
  • Prof. A.J. Van den Berg
    Non-domestic arbitral awards under the 1958 New York Convention
    102

    The court discusses which awards are considered non-domestic even if rendered in the State of enforcement (international element, lex mercatoria).

  • Prof. A.J. Van den Berg
    Consolidated Arbitrations, the New York Arbitration Convention and the Dutch Arbitration Act 1986 - A Replique to Mr Jarvin
    225

    Multi-party disputes: The court discusses the consolidation of arbitrations; also, whether the possibility of conflicting awards is a ground for refusing enforcement of an arbitration agreement.

  • Prof. A.J. Van den Berg
    Recent Enforcement Problems under the New York and ICSID Conventions
  • Prof. A.J. Van den Berg
    The New York Convention 1958 and Panama Convention 1975: Redundancy or Compatibility?
    512
  • Prof. A.J. Van den Berg
    La Aplicación De La Convención de Nueva York de 1958 A Laudos No Nacionales
    109

    The court discusses whether an “a-national” award falls under the Convention. 

  • Prof. A.J. Van den Berg
    Striving for uniform interpretation
    001

    The court discusses general questions relating to the interpretation of the Convention as an international treaty, also in respect of the methods of interpretation laid down in the 1969 Vienna Convention; the relationship between the New York Convention and the UNCITRAL Model Law and Recommendation 2006. 

  • Prof. A.J. Van den Berg
    Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention
  • Prof. A.J. Van den Berg
    50 Years of the New York Convention
  • Prof. A.J. Van den Berg
    Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Annulled in Russia
    516

    Award not binding, suspended or set aside: The court discusses the difference between the exclusive jurisdiction to set aside an award (primary jurisdiction), which belongs to the courts of the country of origin of the award, and the jurisdiction of all other courts to recognize and enforce the award (secondary jurisdiction); issues relating to the determination of the “competent authority”; and whether an award that has been set aside in the country of origin can be enforced in another State under the Convention.

  • Alexis Mourre
    "May Or Must?" Las Causales De No Reconocimiento De Laudos Previstas En El Articulo V De La Convención De Nueva York, son Ellas Facultativas?
    500

    The court discusses the overall scheme and/or pro-enforcement bias of the Convention.

  • Andrea Giardina
    The Practical Application of Multilateral Conventions
    703(A)
  • Andrea Saldarriaga
    El Requisito De Forma Escrita Del Articulo II .2 De La Convención De Nuevayork Y La Doctrina Del Grupo De Sociedades, Están De Más En El Arbitraje Internacional?
    106

    The court discusses issues relating to the identity of the party against whom enforcement of the arbitral award is sought, including: piercing of the corporate veil, succession, assignment, State or State entity, group of companies, agent or principal, etc. For the related defenses to enforcement, see Art. V(1)(a).

    226

    Multi-party disputes: The court discusses under which conditions non-signatories are covered by an arbitration agreement entered into by another party.

  • Andreas Reiner
    The Form of the Agent's Power to Sign an Arbitration Agreement and Article II(2) of the New York Convention
    212

    The court discusses issues specific to an arbitration agreement concluded through an agent or broker, e.g., whether the authorization to conclude it must also be in writing.

  • Andres Cerisola
    Convención De Nueva York Y Convención De Montevideo De 1979
    703(A)
  • Andrés Jana Linetzky And Johanna Klein Kranenberg
    La Convención De Nueva York Y El Ciadi Reconocimiento Y Ejecución De Laudos Arbitrales Bajo La Convención De Washington
    703(A)
  • Andrew Rogers
    The Enforcement of Awards Nullified in the Country of Origin
    516

    Award not binding, suspended or set aside: The court discusses the difference between the exclusive jurisdiction to set aside an award (primary jurisdiction), which belongs to the courts of the country of origin of the award, and the jurisdiction of all other courts to recognize and enforce the award (secondary jurisdiction); issues relating to the determination of the “competent authority”; and whether an award that has been set aside in the country of origin can be enforced in another State under the Convention.

  • Antonio Aljure Salame
    El Literal C) Del Articulo V De La Convención De Nueva York Del 1o De Junio De 1958
    512
  • Antonio Aljure Salame
    Convención De Nueva York Y Convención De Panamá
    704(A)
  • Anthony C. Sinclair
    The Assignment of Arbitration Agreements
    212

    The court discusses issues specific to an arbitration agreement concluded through an agent or broker, e.g., whether the authorization to conclude it must also be in writing.

    226

    Multi-party disputes: The court discusses under which conditions non-signatories are covered by an arbitration agreement entered into by another party.

  • Arthur Bülow
    Das UN-Übereinkommen über die Anerkennung und Vollstreckung ausländischer Schiedssprüche
  • Audley Sheppard
    Public Policy and the Enforcement of Arbitral Awards: Should there be a Global Standard
    518

    Public policy: The court discusses the meaning of (international as compared to domestic) public policy, generally defined as the basic notions of morality and justice of the enforcement State.

    524

    Public policy: The court discusses the effect of other alleged violations of public policy on the recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award, such as contradictory reasons, manifest disregard of the law (US), etc.

  • Bernard Hanotiau
    The Law Applic able to Arbitrability
    223

    The court discusses whether a certain dispute could be settled by arbitration, and the law applicable to that determination.

    519

    Public policy: The court discusses cases in which the subject matter of the award was not arbitrable in the enforcement State on public policy grounds.

  • Bernard Hanotiau
    Complex Arbitrations -Multiparty, MuIticontract, Multi-issue and Class Actions
    225

    Multi-party disputes: The court discusses the consolidation of arbitrations; also, whether the possibility of conflicting awards is a ground for refusing enforcement of an arbitration agreement.

    227

    Multi-party disputes: The court discusses whether related court proceedings may absorb (by vis atractiva) arbitration proceedings.

  • Bernard Hanotiau
    Complex - Multicontract-Multiparty - Arbitrations
    225

    Multi-party disputes: The court discusses the consolidation of arbitrations; also, whether the possibility of conflicting awards is a ground for refusing enforcement of an arbitration agreement.

    226

    Multi-party disputes: The court discusses under which conditions non-signatories are covered by an arbitration agreement entered into by another party.

  • Bernard Hanotiau and Olivier Caprasse
    Public Policy in International Commercial Arbitration
    520

    Public policy:The court discusses the consequences of the default of a party in the arbitration on the recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award against it.

    521

    Public policy: The court discusses the consequences of the apparent or actual bias of an arbitrator on the recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award.

    522

    Public policy: The court discusses the consequences of the lack of reasons in the award on its recognition and enforcement.

    523

    Public policy: The court discusses alleged violations of a fundamental rule of due process in the arbitration on the recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award, including the failure to communicate the names of the arbitrators, the failure to send copies of reports or letters filed in the arbitration, etc.

    524

    Public policy: The court discusses the effect of other alleged violations of public policy on the recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award, such as contradictory reasons, manifest disregard of the law (US), etc.

  • Bernardo M. Cremades
    Los Convenios De Nueva York Y Ginebra: Reconocimiento Y Ejecución Del Laudo Anulado En La Sede
    516

    Award not binding, suspended or set aside: The court discusses the difference between the exclusive jurisdiction to set aside an award (primary jurisdiction), which belongs to the courts of the country of origin of the award, and the jurisdiction of all other courts to recognize and enforce the award (secondary jurisdiction); issues relating to the determination of the “competent authority”; and whether an award that has been set aside in the country of origin can be enforced in another State under the Convention.

  • Bernardo Sepúlveda-Amor and Merryl Lawry-White
    State Responsibility and the Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
  • Bernhard Berger and Franz Kellerhals (eds.)
    International and Domestic Arbitration in Switzerland, 3rd ed.
  • Böckstiegel / Kröll / Nacimiento (eds.)
    Arbitration in Germany – The Model Law in Practice
  • C. Ignacia Suarez Anzorena
    The Incapacity Defence Under the New York Convention
    505
  • C. Ignacia Suarez Anzorena
    La Defensa De Incapacidad En La Convención De Nueva York
    505
  • Carole Malinvaud
    Reconocimiento Y Ejecución De Laudos Arbitrales Anulados. La Experiencia Francesa
    516

    Award not binding, suspended or set aside: The court discusses the difference between the exclusive jurisdiction to set aside an award (primary jurisdiction), which belongs to the courts of the country of origin of the award, and the jurisdiction of all other courts to recognize and enforce the award (secondary jurisdiction); issues relating to the determination of the “competent authority”; and whether an award that has been set aside in the country of origin can be enforced in another State under the Convention.

  • Carolyn B. Lamm and Jeremy K. Sharpe
    Inoperative Arbitration Agreements under the New York Convention
    220

    The court discusses how to interpret the Convention’s requirement that the agreement is not null and void etc., as well as specific cases of invalidity: e.g., lack of consent (misrepresentation, duress, or fraud), vague wording of the arbitral clause; other terms of the contract contradict the intention to arbitrate, etc.

  • Carolyn B. Lamm and Jocelyn A. Aqua
    Defining the Party - Who is a Proper Party in an International Arbitration before the American Arbitration Association and other International Institutions
    106

    The court discusses issues relating to the identity of the party against whom enforcement of the arbitral award is sought, including: piercing of the corporate veil, succession, assignment, State or State entity, group of companies, agent or principal, etc. For the related defenses to enforcement, see Art. V(1)(a).

  • Christoph Liebscher
    Arbitration of Antitrust Disputes
    223

    The court discusses whether a certain dispute could be settled by arbitration, and the law applicable to that determination.

    519

    Public policy: The court discusses cases in which the subject matter of the award was not arbitrable in the enforcement State on public policy grounds.

  • Christoph Müller and Sabrina Pearson
    Swiss Case Law in International Arbitration
  • Claus von Wobeser
    La Incorporación Por Referencia
    209
  • Convention of 1958: An Overview
    The New York Convention of 1958: An Overview
  • Cristián Conejero Roos
    Cláusulas Amplias O Cláusulas Detalladas?: Lecciones Y Reflexiones Bajo La Convención De Nueva York
    202

    The court discusses the form in which the arbitration agreement is expressed: short form arbitration clause, reference to rules of institution, etc.

  • Dana Freyer
    The Enforcement of Awards Affected by Judicial Orders of Annulment at the Place of Arbitration
    516

    Award not binding, suspended or set aside: The court discusses the difference between the exclusive jurisdiction to set aside an award (primary jurisdiction), which belongs to the courts of the country of origin of the award, and the jurisdiction of all other courts to recognize and enforce the award (secondary jurisdiction); issues relating to the determination of the “competent authority”; and whether an award that has been set aside in the country of origin can be enforced in another State under the Convention.

  • Dana Freyer
    United States Recognition and Enforcement of Annulled Foreign Arbitral Awards - The Aftermath of the Chromalloy Case
    516

    Award not binding, suspended or set aside: The court discusses the difference between the exclusive jurisdiction to set aside an award (primary jurisdiction), which belongs to the courts of the country of origin of the award, and the jurisdiction of all other courts to recognize and enforce the award (secondary jurisdiction); issues relating to the determination of the “competent authority”; and whether an award that has been set aside in the country of origin can be enforced in another State under the Convention.

  • Dana H. Freyer and Hamid G. Gharavi
    Finality and Enforceability of Foreign Arbitral Awards: From "Double Exequatur" to the Enforcement of Annulled Awards: A Suggested Path to Uniformity Amidst Diversity
    514
  • Dana H. Freyer and Rona G. Shamoon
    Limiting And Expanding By Contract U.S. Court Review Of Arbitral Awards
    205

    The court discusses the first alternative requirement of Art. II(2) that the arbitral award is “signed by the parties”.

  • David Arias
    La Anulación Del Laudo En La Sede Y La Anulación Del Laudo Por La Autoridad Cuya Lex Fori Se Aplicó
    516

    Award not binding, suspended or set aside: The court discusses the difference between the exclusive jurisdiction to set aside an award (primary jurisdiction), which belongs to the courts of the country of origin of the award, and the jurisdiction of all other courts to recognize and enforce the award (secondary jurisdiction); issues relating to the determination of the “competent authority”; and whether an award that has been set aside in the country of origin can be enforced in another State under the Convention.