US 802

22 - 08 - 2014

US 802

Yearbook Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, A.J. van den Berg (ed.), Vol. XXXIX (2014)
Jurisdiction United States
Summary

US 802. United States District Court, Southern District of California, 22 August 2013 and 22 August 2014

Related topics
205

The court discusses the first alternative requirement of Art. II(2) that the arbitral award is “signed by the parties”.

Signatures
214-216 Field of application
216A Analogous applicability of Art. VII(1)
217

The court discusses the meaning and effect of the referral of the resolution of disputes to arbitration, including: who can ask for referral and when, whether a party has waived its right to request arbitration, the defense that there was no contract at all; whether there was a condition precedent to the commencement of arbitration (e.g. mediation), stay of proceedings v. compelling arbitration, and national procedural specificities such as remand and removal (US), effect of class action. etc.

Referral to arbitration in general
501

The court discusses questions relating to the general approach taken by the Convention to the grounds for refusal of recognition and enforcement, including its pro-enforcement bias, as well as the system of the Convention, under which recognition and enforcement may only be denied on seven listed grounds and the petitioner has only the obligations set out in Art. IV.

Grounds are exhaustive
704(A) Panama Convention of 1975
US 802