US 245

13 - 03 - 1997

US 245

Yearbook Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, A.J. van den Berg (ed.), Vol. XXIII (1998)
Jurisdiction United States
Original full text Full text decision US 245
Summary

US 245. United States District Court, District of South Carolina, Charleston Division in Admiralty, 13 March 1997, Nos. 2:95-3673-23, 2:96-0095-23 and 2:96-3288-23

Related topics
202

The court discusses the form in which the arbitration agreement is expressed: short form arbitration clause, reference to rules of institution, etc.

Contents of arbitration agreement
211

The court discusses issues specific to bills of lading and charterparties, such as whether the subsequent holder of the bill of lading is bound by the arbitration agreement therein and whether the arbitration clause in the charterparty is incorporated into the bill of lading.

Bill of lading and charter party
217

The court discusses the meaning and effect of the referral of the resolution of disputes to arbitration, including: who can ask for referral and when, whether a party has waived its right to request arbitration, the defense that there was no contract at all; whether there was a condition precedent to the commencement of arbitration (e.g. mediation), stay of proceedings v. compelling arbitration, and national procedural specificities such as remand and removal (US), effect of class action. etc.

Referral to arbitration in general
221

The court discusses which law – lex fori, lex contractus, law of the State where the award will be made – applies specifically to determining whether an agreement to arbitrate is “null and void etc.“, and, by extension, which law applies to determining the validity of arbitration agreements.

Law applicable to "Null and void", etc. (for formal validity and applicable law, see Art. II, ¶204)
500

The court discusses the overall scheme and/or pro-enforcement bias of the Convention.

Grounds for refusal of enforcement in general
US 245