UK 57

28 - 07 - 1999

UK 57

Yearbook Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, A.J. van den Berg (ed.), Vol. XXVI (2001)
Jurisdiction United Kingdom
Original full text Full text decision UK 57
Summary

UK 57. High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court, 28 July 1999

Related topics
203-204 Formal validity, uniform law and municipal law
206

The court discusses the second alternative requirement of Art. II(2) that the arbitration agreement is “contained in an exchange of letters or telegrams”.

Exchange of letters or telegrams
217

The court discusses the meaning and effect of the referral of the resolution of disputes to arbitration, including: who can ask for referral and when, whether a party has waived its right to request arbitration, the defense that there was no contract at all; whether there was a condition precedent to the commencement of arbitration (e.g. mediation), stay of proceedings v. compelling arbitration, and national procedural specificities such as remand and removal (US), effect of class action. etc.

Referral to arbitration in general
222

The court discusses the principle of competence-competence, including whether the parties “intended to have arbitrability decided by an arbitrator”, and the separability of the arbitration agreement from the main contract.

Arbitrator's competence and separability of the arbitration clause
223

The court discusses whether a certain dispute could be settled by arbitration, and the law applicable to that determination.

Arbitrability (see also Art. V(2) sub ground a. "arbitrability", ¶519)
227

Multi-party disputes: The court discusses whether related court proceedings may absorb (by vis atractiva) arbitration proceedings.

Concurrent court proceedings ("indivisibility")
UK 57