RUSSIAN FEDERATION 43

29 - 08 - 2017

RUSSIAN FEDERATION 43

Yearbook Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, S. W. Schill (ed.), Vol. XLIII (2018)
Jurisdiction Russian Federation
Summary

Russian Federation 43. Public Joint Stock Company Tatneft v. Ukraine, Arbitrazh Court, City of Moscow, 4 July 2017, and Arbitrazh Court, Moscow District, Case No. A40-67511/17-29-659, 29 August 2017

Related topics
101

The court discusses the determination and relevance of the place where the award was made (in a foreign State or another contracting State.

Award made in the territory of another (Contracting) State (paragraphs 1 and 3 - first or "reciprocity" reservation)
301

The court discusses the principle that the procedure for the enforcement of awards under the Convention is governed by the lex fori, as well as procedural issues (such as the competent enforcement court) not falling under the specific cases of ¶¶ 302-307.

Procedure for enforcement in general
501

The court discusses questions relating to the general approach taken by the Convention to the grounds for refusal of recognition and enforcement, including its pro-enforcement bias, as well as the system of the Convention, under which recognition and enforcement may only be denied on seven listed grounds and the petitioner has only the obligations set out in Art. IV.

Grounds are exhaustive
RUSSIAN FEDERATION 43