NETHERLANDS 66

06 - 11 - 2018

NETHERLANDS 66

Yearbook Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, S. W. Schill (ed.), Vol. XLIV (2019)
Jurisdiction The Netherlands
Summary

Netherlands 66. Ascom Group SA et al. v. Republic of Kazakhstan, Gerechtshof, Amsterdam, Case No. 200.224.067/01, 6 November 2018

Related topics
301

The court discusses the principle that the procedure for the enforcement of awards under the Convention is governed by the lex fori, as well as procedural issues (such as the competent enforcement court) not falling under the specific cases of ¶¶ 302-307.

Procedure for enforcement in general
511

Due process: The court discusses various irregularities affecting due process, including letters not sent, names of arbitrators or experts not communicated, language of proceedings and communications, etc.

"Otherwise unable to present his case"
524

Public policy: The court discusses the effect of other alleged violations of public policy on the recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award, such as contradictory reasons, manifest disregard of the law (US), etc.

Other cases
601

The court discusses the conditions for granting adjournment of a proceeding relating to the recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award, and the court’s discretionary power to do so, as well the determination of “suitable security” and the power to request it.

Adjournment of decision on enforcement
NETHERLANDS 66