The court decisions available on this website interpret and apply the New York Convention. These court decisions are published in the Yearbook Commercial Arbitration since its Volume I (1976).
For instructions on how to search for court decisions per topic and per country in this website, please refer to our helpful access guide here.
Mauritius No. 3, Rostruct (Africa) Ltd v. Geosond Holding AG, Supreme Court of Mauritius, SCR No. 109801, 9 November 2015
Supreme Court of Mauritius, 9 November 2015
Rostruct (Africa) Ltd v. Geosond Holding AG
Public policy: The court discusses cases in which the subject matter of the award was not arbitrable in the enforcement State on public policy grounds.
Mauritius No. 4, Paolo Italo Segatto v. Geosond Holding Ltd, Supreme Court of Mauritius, SCR No. 109940, 9 November 2015
Supreme Court of Mauritius, 9 November 2015
Paolo Italo Segatto v. Geosond Holding Ltd
Public policy: The court discusses cases in which the subject matter of the award was not arbitrable in the enforcement State on public policy grounds.
Mauritius 1. Supreme Court of Mauritius, 28 March 2014
The court discusses questions relating to the general approach taken by the Convention to the grounds for refusal of recognition and enforcement, including its pro-enforcement bias, as well as the system of the Convention, under which recognition and enforcement may only be denied on seven listed grounds and the petitioner has only the obligations set out in Art. IV.
Mauritius No. 2, Macsteel International Far East Limited v. Desbro International Limited, Supreme Court of Mauritius, Record No. 105057, 19 January 2012
Supreme Court of Mauritius, 19 January 2012
Macsteel International Far East Limited v. Desbro International Limited
The court discusses the principle that the procedure for the enforcement of awards under the Convention is governed by the lex fori, as well as procedural issues (such as the competent enforcement court) not falling under the specific cases of ¶¶ 302-307.