The Court of Appeal set aside the first instance order which had granted an application to register an English court judgment confirming a London award. It held that the appeal before it was essentially an opposition to an application to enforce the London award, and that matters of recognition and enforcement of foreign awards were governed by the Arbitration Act. To proceed solely under the Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgment Act 1958 (REJA), as the court below had done, “would fly in the face of the clear language” of the Arbitration Act. The Court then remanded the case to the High Court for a de novo examination of the objection of lack of arbitral jurisdiction based on the argument that there had been fraud in the formation of the contract.